Liars, Tigers, and Malfeasance Oh My!

Yesterday Mr. Frei showed me a letter that he received in the mail a few days ago. It suggests that I be a write in candidate for the Planning Board. I would love nothing more than an opportunity to participate in town government, in fact I have spent the past nine months trying to fill a vacancy on the finance board! Maybe I do need to be written in if I want to "play with the good old boys," because even though the finance board is comprised of volunteers, and despite the fact that there is no job description to discern who is qualified to serve and who is not, I was told that I did not have the right qualifications because I did not have "million dollar budget experience." After I showed them you don't actually need million dollar budget experience by pointing out the only budget that is over 1 million dollars is the school budget, and that is always pretty well set for numbers and after speaking to numerous past members of the finance board who all unanimously laughed at "million dollar budget experience" as a requirement, other excuses to exclude me were made. My favorite excuse was on January 27th when I was told "budget season was almost over." To this I replied, "how can budget season be over? The select board budget is not due until February 1st, the cherry sheets from the state don't even come out until March, and your final budget isn't due until April 21st!?" Budget season was far from over on January 27th, but even if Harhay's statement about budget season being over had been true, as chair of the finance board, doesn't he realize that the end of one budget season is simply the beginning of another? I was told only the moderator could appoint people onto the board. I showed them their own bylaws which prove it's not true. The moderator only has 30 days from the Town Meeting to appoint a finance board. After that the finance board themselves appoint new members. Once I pointed this out to Harhay he decided to get rid of me by "voting not to self appoint." and to "change the language of the bylaw." Again, I was all over that. It is actually unlawful to not follow your bylaws.... They are essentially no different from MGL's and must be followed. According to Harhay, town counsel agreed with me on this point. So excuses were endlessly made and I zapped the credibility out of each one. This went on for nine months. A second seat opened on the finance board. Now with two vacancies, how could an intelligent, college educated, motivated and articulate individual with a math background not be invited onto the board? I sent another letter of interest, just to be sure they knew I was still interested. This after sending two prior letters of interest, a resume, references, meeting with Harhay in person, meeting with Hardy in person and dozens of phone calls.

Still, I was not invited onto the Finance Board.

In order to wiggle out of the legal "situation" they created (by unlawfully voting to not self appoint in total disregard of the town bylaws) they were told by legal counsel to repost the vacancies. Apparently they did. And I reapplied. But instead of offering me a seat they scrounged up two "more qualified people" (despite no job description or written qualifications) and held a meeting which I was not even invited to, yet the other two applicants were present at that meeting.. .and they got appointed by the finance board. The very same finance board that does not self appoint... appointed them, ten days before the annual town meeting, when the moderator would once again have the power to appoint.

Wettlaufer frequently claims that no one volunteers for boards. This is simply not true. Maybe there are times when he has trouble hand-picking people due to low interest but that is not the same as no one volunteering. Wettlaufer and Arnold attended nearly all the finance board meetings ( "the budget season is over" finance board meetings....) so my not being appointed to the board has as much to do with them as it does with Harhay and Hardy. In fact, after reviewing the finance board minutes, Wettlaufer's and Arnold's attendance at finance board meetings increased once I declared my interest in serving. They were both present the night when two new people were appointed and I was not invited. Are they in cahoots? BANK ON IT!

With only two days until the election it would be impossible for me to have success as a write in candidate. But by all means if there is anyone who wants to write me in for the planning board seat I would be honored, but that board is no picnic. I attended a planning board meeting..... Lynn Arnold constantly talks over whoever is speaking, another time she whispered with the lawyer during a public hearing which is rude and a blatant Open Meeting Law violation, and the entire board never even introduced themselves, yet they inquired who I was. All in all it is a very unfriendly board. It is clear that no one there has any interest in allowing residents of Holland to realize any improvements to their homes or properties, all these board members want to do is tell you, "you can' t do that" and "that's not allowed." They tell you this even when IT IS allowed. Some people do get what they want. Lynn Arnold doubled the size of her house on a non-conforming lot in violation of local bylaws as well as M.G.L.; Andrew Harhay (finance board chair and neighbor to Lynn Arnold.... Do you see now why they are all in cahoots?) was granted a variance because his house infringed on setback requirements mandated by the local bylaws. To read about it, click here!

What a shame that I spent nine months trying to appease these people by providing every scrap of documentation they asked for, but don't require from other candidates. What a shame that I was asked to prove my skills while others (according to finance board minutes) get a phone interview and then three days later (not nine months) get appointed to the board. My efforts and research could have been put to good use by researching ways for the town to curb costs and save money. The lesson here is that motivated honest people need not apply.

June 23, 2013, Dana Manning

Leave a comment